Continuous review rather than deadline scrambling — configure due dates and alerts for the obligations and records your carrier tracks.
A DOT compliance review examines records you were supposed to have been keeping all along. That is the whole difficulty: the work is continuous, the deadline is unannounced, and the gaps you find during preparation are usually the ones you can no longer fix.
Continuous review rather than deadline scrambling — configure due dates and alerts for the obligations and records your carrier tracks.
Driver qualification against Part 391 — required documents tracked as requirements, with the three-year retention enforced by archiving.
Clearinghouse queries tracked per driver — the pre-employment full query and the annual limited query that most often gets missed.
Part 395 HOS auditing from connected ELD data — find your own violation patterns before a review does.
Vehicle maintenance and inspection records — PM schedules, work orders, and annual inspections retained alongside the equipment they belong to.
Authority credentials tracked — USDOT, MC number, UCR, IRP base plate, and insurance certificates with expiry alerting.
Review packets — compile the available evidence for a driver, vehicle, or fleet and validate it against the specific request.
Reviews focus on general compliance, driver qualification, driver duty status, vehicle maintenance, hazardous materials where applicable, and accident records. Most findings against small carriers cluster in two of those: driver qualification and hours of service.
Driver qualification findings are usually incompleteness rather than absence — a file that lacks the annual MVR review, a medical certificate that expired, a §391.23 previous-employer investigation that was sent but never followed up, or a departed driver whose file was deleted before the three-year retention period ran out.
Hours-of-service findings come from the logs themselves, which means they are only preventable in advance. Once the quarter is recorded, the violations are in the data. Auditing your own logs continuously is the only intervention available.
Vehicle maintenance is the quieter third area: annual inspections, periodic maintenance records, and driver vehicle inspection reports all have retention requirements, and records kept in a shop folder rather than a system are difficult to produce under deadline.
Compliance obligations are attributes of the drivers and vehicles you dispatch every day. When they live in a separate system, the dispatcher making the assignment cannot see them, and the safety person maintaining them cannot see the operational consequences.
Keeping them together means a driver with an expired medical card is visibly unavailable on the board, and a truck with an overdue annual inspection is not assigned. The compliance program stops being a parallel administrative exercise and becomes a constraint on operations, which is what it is supposed to be.
Compare the plan that contains your required workflows, or request a free guided walkthrough. Product access requires a paid subscription unless sales provides a written trial offer.
View plansIt helps organize records a motor carrier may need to maintain, including driver qualification files under Part 391, drug-and-alcohol program and Clearinghouse-query records, hours-of-service records under Part 395, vehicle maintenance and inspection records, and authority credentials. Carriers configure due dates and alerts, then qualified reviewers validate completeness and compliance.
Common triggers include a poor CSA score in one or more BASIC categories, a serious crash, a complaint, or the new-entrant safety audit that applies to carriers within their first year of operation. Because the timing is largely outside your control, the practical strategy is to be ready continuously rather than to prepare reactively.
Produce complete driver qualification files, confirm Clearinghouse queries are current for every CDL driver, audit hours-of-service data for the review period, and gather vehicle maintenance and inspection records. Software helps most by making that a generation step rather than a discovery step — the gaps found while preparing are usually the ones that can no longer be closed.
Yes. Preventive maintenance schedules, work orders, annual inspections, and driver vehicle inspection reports are tracked against each unit, so the maintenance side of a review is supported by the same system as the driver side.
Indirectly, by addressing the inputs. CSA scores respond to violations and inspection outcomes over time, so closing driver qualification gaps and correcting hours-of-service patterns is what moves them. No software changes a score directly, and any vendor claiming otherwise is overselling.
Yes. For carriers that also operate in Canada, National Safety Code requirements and Canadian hours-of-service rules are supported alongside the US federal ones, and ACE/ACI eManifest filing is built in. US-only carriers simply never use those parts.